Partner

Patrick E. Michela

Office

One California Plaza
300 So. Grand Avenue, 37th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90071-3147

Phones

(213) 621-0840 – Direct
(213) 620-0460 – General
(213) 624-4840 – Fax

Email

Legal Assistant

OVERVIEW

Litigator Patrick E. Michela practices in the area of general civil and business litigation, with an emphasis on employment defense.

Patrick’s employment work involves litigation for small- and medium-sized companies in both state and federal courts, as well as arbitration before the American Arbitration Association. He has defended numerous class action lawsuits and representative actions under the California Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Patrick also has extensive experience in compelling arbitration of employment-law claims under both private arbitration agreements and under collective bargaining agreements against union-represented employees.

In his business and commercial litigation representation, Patrick helps resolve a range of disputes, including breach of contract, business torts, breach of fiduciary duty, unfair competition, and partnership disputes.

Real estate litigation is an additional part of his background and current counsel. Patrick offers significant experience in real estate matters, including boundary disputes, condemnation, easements, and nuisance claims.

Patrick graduated from the University of California, Los Angeles, and received his Juris Doctor degree from Pepperdine University School of Law. He was an editor of the Pepperdine Law Review.
  • Pepperdine University School of Law – J.D. 1994
  • University of California, Los Angeles – B.A. 1989

Employment Wrongful Termination

Defended plaintiff employee’s appeal of trial court’s order dismissing court action following arbitration award and affirming previous grant of motion to compel arbitration. The appellate court held that because the plaintiff failed to timely seek vacatur of the arbitration award, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider the motion to vacate, and the order of dismissal was an unappealable order.

California Private Attorney General Action

Obtained ruling overturning trial court’s denial of motion to compel arbitration after U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in Moriana v. Viking River Cruises upheld the right of employers to include provisions in arbitration agreements compelling individual PAGA actions to arbitration.

Employment Arbitration

Moved to compel arbitration and enforce waiver of class claims on behalf of a major retailer. Plaintiffs appealed and matter was resolved during pendency of appeal.

Damage Claims of Railroad Easement

Acted on behalf of large interstate railroad and obtained summary adjudication of all damage claims asserted against railroad in action involving viability of railroad easement. Railroad eventually obtained judgment in its favor on all remaining claims at trial. Judgment upheld by the California Courts of Appeal.

Restraining Order and Injunction of Property Dispute

Obtained temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction blocking trustee’s sale of residential property in dispute between two mortgage lenders involving proper lien priorities in title to property.

Breach of Royalty Agreement with Banking Software

Obtained summary judgment on behalf of defendant accused of breaching royalty agreement in connection with licensing of computer “flow charts” underlying regulatory banking software. Decision upheld by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

Anti-SLAPP Motion/Landowner Dispute

Represented landowner involved in a dispute with a neighboring sewage treatment plant regarding scope of easement to discharge treated effluent on landowner’s property. Successfully brought “anti-SLAPP” motion against sewage treatment company on grounds that the sewage treatment company was attempting to infringe on landowner’s first amendment rights of free speech and petition. Decision of trial court upheld on appeal.

Appeal of Decision Finding Labor Statutes Unconstitutional

Represented joint labor-management committee in appeal of trial court decision holding sections 1771.2 and 1776(e) of the Labor Code unconstitutional on due process grounds. Appeal stayed as a result of defendant’s bankruptcy.

Newsletter

Subscribe now to receive the latest legal news